Expert Witness Services
We comply with Rule 702 of Civil Procedures to handle expert witness services with our highly-qualified team of experts. These rules stipulate that an expert should provide testimony based on scientific facts and data, using reliable methods, and apply these principles & methods to the facts of the case.
Rule 702. Testimony by Expert Witnesses
A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if:
(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue;
(b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data;
(c) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods; and
(d) the expert has reliably applied the principles and methods to the facts of the case.
Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_702
Areas of Expertise
Technical Expert Witness
(a) PhD-level and MS EE engineers from corporations in technology and ex-Fortune 500 experts, in Computer Science, Mobile Computing, Hardware, Networking, Operating Systems;
(b) Assistance with Patent litigation: Invalidity Contentions, Claim Charts, Infringement Contentions, and completing an “Expert Report”;
(c) Assistance with Inter-parties Review (IPRs / PTAB);
(d) Assistance in trade secret cases and software-related litigation;
(e) Deposition and Trial Experience;
(f) Review software, log analysis, code reviews, hardware/software from networks to source code, hands-on dissection of code and hardware;
Damages Experts
(a) Loss of revenues for patent infringement cases, damages reports,
(b) Reasonable royalties and case law for wireless communications systems
![eglacorp server room bkg](https://eglacorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/eglacorp-server-room-bkg.jpg)
![lawyers](https://eglacorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/lawyers.jpg)
Expert Witnesses for Technical and Damages are within our realm, we can assist your case. Call Us for an interview!
Our Expert Witness Experience
- University of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. et. al. v. Motorola Mobility LLC. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida – Case settled in 2014 (Deposed)
- Virtela Technology Services Andrew Funk, File in the US District Court of Denver, Colorado, Expert Witness for Andrew Funk – Case Settled in 2016.
- Del Castillo v. Bank of America – Expert Witness for Bank of America – Case settled 2017
- Seven Networks Google – Expert Witness for Seven Networks – 2017
- Blue Radios Kopin – Expert Witness for Blue Radios– Colorado – 2017 – ongoing (Deposed)
- Mobility Workx T-Mobile – Case Settled – 2017 (Deposed)
- Mobility Workx Verizon Wireless, Damages Expert Witness for Mobility Workx, LLC in E.D. Texas – 2017 – ongoing (Deposed , Case Settled)
- Mobile Manufacturer Carrier, Eastern District of Texas, Expert Witness for Mobile Manufacturer (Confidential & Settled) in 2017
- Talent Mobile Development Headios Group (California Federal Court, 2018 Trademark/Mobile Software) – Jury trial testimonial with 700k award to my client (Trial Testimony)
- Key West Golf Club Cable Provider – Preliminary study – Key West, FL, 2019
- Express Mobile DreamHost, LLC – Expert Witness – US District Court of Delaware – 2019
- Stone v. AT&T, Vehicle – Expert Witness – Expert Witness for AT&T on TCPA Matters, MMS Messaging – US District of San Diego, 2019 (Deposed, Settled)
- XCommerce Express Mobile, Express Mobile vs. BigCommerce, others – Expert Witness for Express Mobile. E.D District of Texas and California Northern District, Review code for client, claim charts, DOE, invalidity defenses, (Deposed, Trial Scheduled)
- Workspot v. Citrix – Expert Witness IPR2019-01002- – Expert Witness for CITRIX – PTAB, 2019 – (Deposed, Instituted but all claims held patentable)
- DISH Network LLC v. Multimedia Content Management LLC – IPR2019-01014 and IPR2019-01015, Expert Witness for Multimedia Content Management, LLC, 2019 (Not instituted, Not Instituted)
- TPI vs Keller Williams, Inc – Damages and Technical Expert Witness, Trade secrets, software, Texas, 2020 (Deposed, Settled)
- Bell Northern Research, LLC LG Electronics, Inc., et al, Infringement & Validity Federal Court, IPRs (3), California, Settled, Terminated Institution
- Bell Northern Research, LLC Samsung et al, Infringement & Validity Federal Court, IPRs (3), California, Assisting infringements reports & damages models, Technical Expert Reports – Case Settled, 2 IPRs not instituted
- TCL – assistance & consulting for several patents and IP cases.
- Barkan Sprint – E.D. of Texas, Technical Expert Reports, Invalidity and Infringement Reports, Deposed (Case Settled)
- Kaiffi T-Mobile, Verizon – E.D. of Texas, Technical Expert Reports (Streaming and wireless) (Withdrawn by Client)
- Flexiworld Amazon, others, Texas Western District, Technical Expert Reports (Streaming Technologies) (Withdrawn)
- Contour Data Solutions v. Gridforce, CDW – Pennsylvania E.D., Technical Expert Reports (Data Center, Cloud, Trade Secrets)
- Mediatek, et. al v. Nippon Telegraph, Nippon Telegraph Media Tek IPR2020-01607, Declaration and Reports, IPR and US District court (Modulation, RF, OFDM, other wireless comm issues, Deposed IPR, Validity and Infringement).
- Netapp v. Proven Networks, IPR2020-01436, Declaration and Reports, and Federal Circuit Case, Proven Networks v. NetApp, Deposed for IPR
- BNR (Mobile / Wireless Patents) – ITC Case U.S. International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-3568, Certain Electronic Devices Having Wireless Communication Capabilities and Components – Ongoing – Mobility Patents, WIFI
- L2MT vs Google – moved to the Northern District of California, Claim Construction Assistance (on hold)
- Gravel Inc T-Mobile, Amazon, and other defendants – E.D. of Texas
- Eric Mendis vs. BMW – Expert Report on BMW Wireless Charger System
-
BMG Music vs.Altice Inc. – Federal Circuit
-
KOM, Inc vs. Netapp – Federal Cicuit
- Cisco Systems vs. Corrigent Networks – IPR
- LG Electronics vs. PANTECH Inc – IPR
- Advising – Pre-trial / 4 Confidential Defendants/Plaintiffs (2013-2014)
![banner white bkg](https://eglacorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/banner-white-bkg.png)
Code Reviews Experience
Our experience in code reviews is extensive (more details).
- Honduran Government, “National Institute of Properties,” Multi-million-dollar platform transferred from the World Bank to the Honduran Government – Code Review for Java, .NET, and Cybersecurity in 2017-2018
- Auditing of Honduran Elections, Forensics and fraud detection and analysis (Pro-Bono) in 2018
- Auditing of Honduran Elections, Forensics and fraud detection (2021)
- Code Reviews & Clean Room Environments
- C/C++ sources from several vendors in 802.11, LTE, 3G systems, Bluetooth, BSP Systems, Augmented Reality, Wearable
- Bash, Docker, PHP, Javascript, Typescript for e-commerce platforms
- PowerShell and others for a Windows platform
- Code Reviews:
IPRs and PTAB Expertise
- Workspot vs Citrix– Expert Witness IPR2019-01002-– Expert Witness for CITRIX – PTAB, (All claims held patentable) PTAB judges agreed with my analysis.
- DISH Network LLC vs Multimedia Content Management LLC– IPR2019-01014 and IPR2019-01015, Expert Witness for Multimedia Content Management, LLC (Denied, Not Instituted)
- LG Electronics v. BNR – Expert Witness for BNR – IPR2020-00108 for U.S. Patent No. 8,416,862 (Terminated, Settlement)
- SAMSUNG v. BNR – Expert Witness for BNR – IPR2020-00611 (Denied) and IPR2020-00613 (Not Instituted) for U.S. Patent No. 8,416,862 – Settled (e.g. https://ptab.uspto.gov/036e63b4-9123-465b-b453-c3aa3c2ea4e)
- Mediatek v. Nippon Telegraph, Inc – Expert witness for Nippon Telegraph IPR2020-01607, (Instituted, ongoing)
- Netapp vs. Proven Networks, Inc – Expert Witness for Proven Networks, IPR2020-01436 (Ongoing).
- Samsung v. Mojo Mobility – Expert for Mojo Mobility
- LG Electronics v. PANTECH – Expert for PANTECH
- Cisco Systems v. Corrigent Networks – Expert for Corrigent
![EGLA-Experts-Logo-Large](https://eglacorp.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/EGLA-Experts-Logo-Large.png)